Previously I mentioned that I filed a case with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (“HRTO”) against Techrights, which is run by Roy Schestowitz.

He had until March 11, 2024 to file a Form 2 Response. That time limit has been reached.

What happens next depends on how Roy has handled this lawsuit.

In one situation, he ignored it and will be deemed to have accepted the allegations. The case will go on without any further input from him.

The other situation is that he did respond to it, and the HRTO has to go through his response to make sure there are no errors.

It is a waiting game at this point.

But I think the first situation is what is happening. On IRC and his website, Mr. Schestowitz has described this case as a “fake lawsuit” before a “fake tribunal.”

And while he says those things, in another breath he claims I lied to this “fake tribunal.”

So which is it? Is it real or fake? How can I lie to something that is fake? Mr. Schestowitz seems to be nonsensical.

It is most definitely a real tribunal. You can visit their website here.

The laws he violated in Ontario, Canada can be viewed here. Specifically Section 1, 8 and 9.

Services
1 Every person has a right to equal treatment with respect to services, goods and facilities, without discrimination because of race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, marital status, family status or disability. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, s. 1; 1999, c. 6, s. 28 (1); 2001, c. 32, s. 27 (1); 2005, c. 5, s. 32 (1); 2012, c. 7, s. 1.

Reprisals
8 Every person has a right to claim and enforce his or her rights under this Act, to institute and participate in proceedings under this Act and to refuse to infringe a right of another person under this Act, without reprisal or threat of reprisal for so doing. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, s. 8.

Infringement prohibited
9 No person shall infringe or do, directly or indirectly, anything that infringes a right under this Part. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, s. 9.

He currently makes claims that I am under “active investigation” for “harassment” but it is not harassment to exercise your rights under the Human Rights Code.

Imagine how the court system would work if the party being sued could just say “this is harassment”. The whole thing would fall apart and access to justice would die off.

His claims that there is an active investigation is dubious at best. He publishes articles every Monday about me and it is usually something that is either forged or some kind of impersonation of me. He has even blamed me for spam, something everyone gets. Am I spamming the world?

(This actually seems likely, spam yourself and take screenshots so you can pretend to be a victim – just a theory though)

On the other hand I’ve reported him to the Manchester police twice for hate crimes. Here is a little tidbit from my e-mail.

So here we go. The Officer indicated to me that Mr and Ms Schestowitz did not pass a criminal threshold for hate crime based harassment. My only option left is to keep the lawsuits going to clear my name.

One important thing to note is that the Officer told them to stop, and if they had any evidence they should send it to him.

Mr. Schestowitz tells an entirely different story on his website. He claims he has permission from the police to keep this up, that there is an active investigation and a bunch of other bald faced lies.

If Mr. Schestowitz had actually passed along evidence to the Officer, I would have heard about it. Yet, on his website he claims he just doesn’t want to waste time on it. That is because he has zero evidence of anything.

Just a bunch of contradictions, conspiracy theories and fake news.